How Does the Employment Rate Look Structural?

It's dropped precipitously over the course of a financial catastrophe, must be a hopeless long-term trend...There is no evidence of structural unemployment. I don’t know how anyone can say with a straight face “The high rate is structural given long-term employment trends” or even “The high rate is now structural because the recession popped a labor bubble.” These arguments are hard to believe, unless you’re arguing that there has been a 30 year bubble where employment rates were artificial above 1980, and 1980 is the “natural” rate of employment. In that case, you are probably crazy, a chump, or pushing another agenda.

You can prefer to read your own tea leaves or use what actually happened in the past to anticipate the future. I’ll pick the latter.

This entry was posted in economy, Labor and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s